VBackground & AnalysisAnalysis
How Fintechs Make Money: Payments, Loans, Platforms
Card terminal, invoice purchase, business account by app, a loan in two days: many businesses use fintechs every day. Anyone who wants to understand whether an offer will stay affordable and reliable needs to know how the provider makes its money. An assessment of the main revenue sources.
Key takeaways
- Fintechs earn mainly from five sources: fees per payment, interest and interest margins, brokerage commissions, subscriptions, and markups on currency exchange.
- Many fintechs are two-sided platforms. According to Rochet and Tirole, what matters is not only the total price but which side pays it, and often it is the merchant.
- Lending platforms have moved from private investors' money to institutional funders and today mainly serve small businesses and the self-employed (Pur, Huesig, and Schmidhammer 2026).
- A low price can come from technology or from outside capital that finances growth. For businesses, what matters is whether the model holds up without fresh capital.
Why it pays to know how a fintech makes money
A fintech is a company that offers financial services using new technology: payment processing, accounts, loans, invoice purchase, currency exchange. For businesses, such providers are often faster and more convenient than their house bank. But every offer that seems free or very cheap is paid for by someone, and it is not always immediately clear by whom.
This article therefore asks: How do fintechs make their money, and what follows for a business that uses their services? To answer it, we first clarify the revenue sources, then present the model of the two-sided market as the thinking model, look more closely at payments and loans, weigh two readings, and finally derive a revenue source check for choosing your own providers.
The five main revenue sources
Behind the variety of offers there are only a few basic patterns. Most fintechs combine two or three of them.
| Revenue source | Example | Who pays? |
|---|---|---|
| Fee per transaction | percentage per card payment, fee per international transfer | usually the merchant or payee |
| Interest and interest margin | loan interest, interest on customer funds the fintech invests | borrowers, indirectly customers with balances |
| Commission | brokering a loan to a bank, invoice purchase for a merchant fee | lender or merchant |
| Subscription | monthly fee for a business account or software | the user |
| Currency markup | gap between the rate applied and the official exchange rate | the user, often without noticing |
Worked example
There is also a source that is hardly visible from outside: many account fintechs issue cards and receive part of the fee the merchant pays for every payment made with them. The customer then pays nothing for the card, and the merchant pays for the payment.
If you do not know what you are paying for, you are usually paying at a point you cannot see.
The thinking model: the two-sided market
The economists Jean-Charles Rochet and Jean Tirole described how two-sided markets work. A platform brings together two groups that need each other, such as cardholders and merchants or borrowers and funders. For the platform, what matters is not only the total price but its distribution: the side whose participation is harder to win is often relieved, and the other side bears most of the costs.
With card payments this explains a familiar picture. Cardholders often pay little or nothing, merchants pay per payment. The more customers carry a card, the less a merchant can refuse it. The same model is used in The digital euro, where the question is whether merchants will accept a new form of payment.
An everyday analogy: a free local advertising paper in your mailbox is not giving anything away. It lives on its advertisers, and they only pay because many households receive the paper. If you are the free side of a fintech, you should ask whom you are the audience for.
Payment services: how a card fee is made up
When a business accepts a card payment, it pays the payment service provider a merchant service charge. It consists of three parts: the interchange fee paid to the bank that issued the card, the fees of the card scheme, and the margin of the payment service provider. In the EU, the interchange fee for consumer cards has been capped since 2015 at 0.2 percent for debit cards and 0.3 percent for credit cards.
Worked example with freely chosen values for scheme fees and margin. Only the 0.3 percent cap on the interchange fee for consumer credit cards in the EU is documented. Actual charges depend on card type, industry, and contract.
For a business, the payment service provider's margin is the negotiable part. Fintechs often advertise a single rate for all cards. That is simple, but with many debit cards it can be more expensive than an itemized model. The Bundesbank's statistics show the volume: with around 14.5 billion payments, the card was the most frequent payment method by number in Germany in 2025, as Paying in B2B describes.
How this business can also fail is shown by the collapse of the payment services company Wirecard in June 2020. A large part of its reported profit was supposed to come from commissions paid by partner firms in countries where it had no license of its own. Whether this business existed on the scale claimed is the subject of criminal proceedings that have not been concluded; the presumption of innocence applies to everyone involved. The sequence is described in Chronicle of an Accounting Scandal.
Loans and platforms: from private investors to funds
Lending platforms connect borrowers and funders over the internet. They usually earn fees from both sides: an origination fee from the borrower and a service fee from the funders. The first such platform launched in the UK in 2005, and smava and auxmoney followed in Germany in 2007.
Pur, Huesig, and Schmidhammer (2026) compared the market leaders in the UK, the US, and Germany over about two decades. Their finding: the business models have converged. Platforms on which private individuals lent each other money became platforms that channel institutional investors' money to borrowers who are poorly served by banks, mainly small businesses, the self-employed, and founders. Private investors are now largely excluded at all three. The authors name regulation, technological progress, and institutional capital as the drivers.
An earlier paper by the same authors on the three largest German platforms showed that they started out similarly and then developed in different directions (Pur, Huesig, and Schmidhammer 2023). Huang and Wang (2023) describe two forms of cooperation between fintechs and banks in China: pure brokering of loans to banks and joint lending. Both bring risks regarding outsourcing, data protection, and market power.
Two readings: cheaper through technology or through other people's money?
Cheaper through technology
- Automated processes lower the cost per transaction.
- No branch network and lean systems without legacy burdens.
- Better data allow faster decisions, for example on loans.
Cheaper through other people's money
- Venture capital finances losses in order to gain market share quickly.
- Prices rise once profit becomes more important than growth.
- Part of the advantage rests on lighter regulation, not on efficiency.
Both explanations apply, depending on the provider and the phase. The work of Pur and co-authors shows how strongly external forces shape the models: regulation and the origin of capital have changed lending platforms as much as their technology. Ahern (2025), presented in detail in Fintechs and supervision, also describes how companies settle where the rules are least burdensome.
For a business, I therefore consider the second reading the more cautious default assumption. A price that is only possible thanks to fresh capital is not a lasting price. That is not an argument against fintechs, but it is an argument for keeping dependence small until a provider has proven itself over several years.
The revenue source check before working together
From the two-sided market and the findings I derive a check that I call the revenue source check. It takes half an hour and belongs before every decision for a payment or lending provider.
Who pays what?
List all charges you pay and ask what the other side pays. Watch out for currency markups, minimum charges, and chargeback fees.
Where does the provider really earn?
Check whether the provider earns from your balance, your customers, or your data. The less visible the revenue source, the more carefully you should read the contract.
Is the provider licensed?
Check in BaFin's company database whether it holds a license as a payment or e-money institution or as a bank. How to check partners beyond that is described in Due diligence on business partners.
What happens if it disappears?
Clarify how quickly you can switch, where your money is held, and whether it is kept separate from the provider's own funds.
Why dependence on a platform becomes risky when it changes the rules is described in Dependence on platforms.
What follows beyond the individual case, and where the limits lie
Fintechs have made payments and loans simpler for small businesses. Yet their business models differ less from those of banks than their advertising suggests: they too live on fees, interest, and commissions, only distributed differently and often less visibly. Research also shows that models converge over time once regulation and funders exert influence.
The limits of this assessment are clear. The studies cited mainly look at lending platforms, less at payment services. Specific revenue figures of individual providers were deliberately not reproduced because they change quickly. The breakdown of the merchant service charge is a worked example.
Conclusion: understand the revenue source first, then choose the provider
To the guiding question: fintechs earn from fees per payment, from interest and interest margins, from commissions, from subscriptions, and from currency markups. The model of the two-sided market explains why one side often pays little and the other a lot, and with payments the business is usually the paying side. Lending platforms have developed into intermediaries of institutional capital for small businesses.
For your business this yields a simple rule: choose a provider only once you know how it earns from you and what happens if that changes. A price you understand is worth more than a price that merely looks low.
Frequently asked questions
How do fintechs make money?
Mainly through fees per payment, interest and interest margins, commissions for brokered loans, subscriptions for accounts or software, and markups on currency exchange. Many combine several of these sources.
How is the fee for card payments made up?
The merchant service charge consists of the interchange fee paid to the card-issuing bank, the card scheme's fees, and the payment service provider's margin. In the EU, the interchange fee for consumer cards is capped at 0.2 percent for debit and 0.3 percent for credit cards.
How do lending platforms earn money?
Usually through an origination fee from the borrower and a service fee from the funders. Many platforms today channel institutional investors' money to small businesses and the self-employed.
Why is a fintech account often free?
Because the provider earns elsewhere, for example from the fees merchants pay for payments made with its cards, from additional services, or from interest on balances. A free offer is therefore not without a revenue source.
How can I tell whether a fintech is reputable?
A first step is BaFin's company database, which lists licensed payment and e-money institutions. Also check the contract, fees, notice periods, and whether customer funds are held separately.
Sources
- Pur, S.; Huesig, S.; Schmidhammer, C. (2026): Drivers of international convergence in digital two-sided platform markets: The case of dominant business model components in online lending. PLoS ONE, 21(7), pp. 1-30.
- Pur, S.; Huesig, S.; Schmidhammer, C. (2023): Towards a Theory on Dominant Business Model Emergence of Marketplace Lending in Germany. Credit and Capital Markets, 56(1), pp. 63-102.
- Huang, R. H.; Wang, C. M. (2023): FinTech-Bank Partnership in China's Credit Market: Models, Risks and Regulatory Responses. European Business Organization Law Review, 24(4), pp. 721-755.
- Ahern, D. (2025): The New Anticipatory Governance Culture for Innovation: Regulatory Foresight, Regulatory Experimentation and Regulatory Learning. European Business Organization Law Review, 26(2), pp. 241-283.
- Rochet, J.-C.; Tirole, J. (2003): Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), pp. 990-1029.
- Regulation (EU) 2015/751 on interchange fees for card-based payment transactions
- Deutsche Bundesbank: strong demand for card payments, press release of July 22, 2026 (in German)
Note. This article is a general assessment and not legal, tax, or investment advice. It does not recommend any provider. Charts and tables without a source are worked examples or the author's own presentations. Criminal proceedings related to Wirecard have not been concluded with final and binding effect; the presumption of innocence applies.



