IGrowth & StrategyGuide
Plan Sales Targets: From Annual Revenue Goal to Weekly Activities
An annual revenue goal says where you want to end up. It does not say what to do on Tuesday. The Target Staircase works the goal backwards step by step until a number for the week remains.
Key takeaways
- A revenue target is an outcome. You can only steer the activities that lead there: conversations, quotes, follow-up dates.
- The Target Staircase works backwards from the annual goal through orders, quotes, and conversations to weekly activities.
- Targets motivate only up to a certain height. A target nobody believes in lowers effort.
- Weekly targets need a fixed appointment where actual and planned numbers sit side by side.
Why are annual targets often forgotten by February?
In December a number is on paper: 15 percent more revenue, 600,000 euros, one million. In January it is present. In February daily business takes over, and until autumn nobody looks at it again. Then twenty percent is missing, and it is too late to correct course.
This is rarely due to a lack of ambition. An annual target is too far away to guide the actions of a single week. Someone wondering on Monday whether to call a prospect or handle a complaint finds no answer in the annual target. They need a number that fits the week.
Research knows the pattern. Jain (2012) shows in a theoretical model of compensation that quotas spanning several periods, such as annual quotas, encourage procrastination. According to the model, such plans can still make sense for a company. For planning in a small business, the consequence is: keep the annual target, but put short stages alongside it.
This piece asks: how do you convert an annual sales target into weekly numbers so that it guides day-to-day action? To answer it, we first explain the difference between outcome targets and activity targets, then work through an example with the target staircase, and finish with how high a target should be, a template, and how to anchor the targets in the team.
A revenue target without a weekly number is a wish with a date.
What is the difference between outcome targets and activity targets?
An outcome target describes what should come out at the end: revenue, number of orders, number of new customers. An activity target describes what you do to get there: hold conversations, write quotes, follow up. The outcome is not in your hands alone, because the customer has a say. The activity is.
Outcome target
- “30 new orders this year”
- Shows only in hindsight.
- Also depends on the customer and the market.
- Suited to direction and annual planning.
Activity target
- “Five first conversations per week”
- Can be ticked off every week.
- Is in your own hands.
- Suited to steering day-to-day work.
You need both. The outcome target sets the direction, the activity target makes it tangible for the week. The link between the two is your conversion rates, meaning the share of cases that move from one stage to the next. Which rates you should know is explained in the article on sales metrics for small and mid-sized businesses.
The Target Staircase: how do I convert an annual goal into weekly activities?
The Target Staircase is the mental model of this article. You stand at the top with the annual goal and walk down step by step. On each step you divide by a rate or an average until a number for the week stands at the bottom.
Set the annual goal
Take a revenue figure you can justify from costs, desired profit, and capacity. Capacity counts: whatever is sold must also be deliverable.
Subtract existing business
Estimate how much revenue is likely to come from existing customers. What remains is the gap that new business has to close.
Convert into orders
Divide the gap by your average order value. Now you know how many new orders are needed.
Convert into quotes
Divide the orders by your close rate. At 30 percent you need 100 quotes for 30 orders.
Convert into conversations and inquiries
Keep dividing by the share of conversations that lead to a quote, and by the share of inquiries that lead to a conversation.
Spread across weeks
Divide the annual values by the number of your working weeks. Subtract vacation, public holidays, and quiet periods. 46 weeks is a workable starting value.
What does that look like in practice? A worked example
The following numbers are freely chosen. An example business plans 600,000 euros in annual revenue. It expects 240,000 euros from existing customers. So new business has to bring in 360,000 euros. With an average order value of 12,000 euros, that makes 30 new orders.
- Inquiries
- First conversations80% of previous stage
- Quotes50% of previous stage
- Orders30% of previous stage
Worked example with assumed rates: 80 percent of inquiries lead to a conversation, 50 percent of conversations to a quote, 30 percent of quotes to an order.
| Stage | Per year | Per week (calculated) | Weekly target (rounded) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inquiries | 250 | 5.4 | 6 |
| First conversations | 200 | 4.3 | 5 |
| Quotes | 100 | 2.2 | 2 to 3 |
| Orders | 30 | 0.65 | 2 to 3 per month |
Worked example
600,000 euros have thus become three numbers for the week: six inquiries, five first conversations, two to three quotes. That can be checked in one minute on Friday. If first conversations are missing three weeks in a row, you know in February and not only in October.
The staircase also shows how strongly the close rate affects the work required. With the same number of orders, the volume of quotes changes considerably:
Worked example: 30 orders divided by the respective close rate.
Raising your rate from 30 to 40 percent saves 25 quotes a year in the example. So before you raise the weekly numbers, it is worth looking at the levers in the article on increasing revenue without more leads.
How high can a sales target be?
The common assumption is: the higher the target, the greater the effort. That holds only up to a point. Chowdhury (1993) had participants in a laboratory experiment negotiate in the role of salespeople and varied the quota level. As the quota rose, effort initially increased. Beyond a certain level it could decrease again. The effect of higher quotas was stronger for people high in self-efficacy, meaning people who trust themselves with the task. This is an experiment with test subjects that shows the direction and provides no prescription for a particular business.
The amount of work has an upper limit too. Claro, Plouffe, and Vieira (2023) found in salesperson data around the introduction of a new compensation plan that too many sales opportunities pursued at once overload people and reduce goal commitment as well as performance. According to their analysis, an incentive-based plan enhanced performance only when the workload was managed at the same time. An activity target should therefore be a number that fits into a normal week.
The third hurdle is implementation. Morelli and Braganza (2012) studied a pharmaceutical company in Spain that they classify as mid-size and that employs a sales force of 250. They interviewed 16 people involved, from the general manager to sales representatives, and found eleven barriers to workable sales quotas. These include an unrealistic overall forecast, the lack of a person who owns target setting, no participation by the salespeople, an opaque formula, missing information, and missing feedback channels from the field. One example from the case: where data was lacking, the revenue target was simply divided by the number of salespeople without looking at the territories. The authors point out that a single case is hard to generalize. Three check questions for your own planning can still be derived: Who owns the Target Staircase? Did the people who are supposed to reach the numbers help calculate them? Can everyone trace how the weekly number comes about? Also keep the planning simple enough to fit on one page.
What does a template for target planning look like?
The template has seven rows. You fill in the left column once a year and check it once a quarter. The values in the middle column come from the worked example, and you enter your own in the right one.
| Row | Example value | Your value |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Annual revenue goal | €600,000 | · |
| 2. Expected revenue from existing customers | €240,000 | · |
| 3. Gap for new business (row 1 minus row 2) | €360,000 | · |
| 4. Average order value | €12,000 | · |
| 5. Orders required (row 3 divided by row 4) | 30 | · |
| 6. Rates: quote → order, conversation → quote, inquiry → conversation | 30%, 50%, 80% | · |
| 7. Weekly targets: inquiries, conversations, quotes | 6, 5, 2 to 3 | · |
Worked example
- The annual goal is justified from costs, profit, and capacity.
- The rates come from your own numbers or are marked as estimates.
- The weekly targets fit into a normal working week.
- Every weekly number has a person responsible.
- There is a fixed appointment where planned and actual numbers are compared.
- Each quarter the rates are measured again and the staircase is recalculated.
How do I anchor the targets in the team?
Numbers work when they are visible regularly. The simplest place for that is a short weekly meeting. Three questions are enough: What was the weekly target? What was achieved? What stands in the way of next week? You will find an agenda for it in the article on weekly team planning in 30 minutes. How weekly targets fit into methods such as OKR or Kanban is shown in the comparison OKR, Kanban, weekly planning.
As soon as several people sell, the question arises of how openly results are shown. Ahearne, Pourmasoudi, Atefi, and Lam (2025) analyzed data from a provider of sales performance management software: 27,883 salespeople at 178 firms in 83 countries over 24 months. Depending on the firm’s setting, salespeople saw no ranking, an anonymous ranking, a ranking with names, or a ranking with names and quotas. Anonymous rankings improved quota attainment but increased turnover. Rankings with names plus displayed quotas reduced turnover without significantly improving quota attainment. Only rankings with names both raised quota attainment and reduced turnover. The firms chose the display themselves. These are therefore observational data, which the authors weight statistically. A ranking group comprised 266 people on average, and for anonymous as well as named rankings the effect was stronger in larger groups. For a team of three the results are a pointer, not a recipe.
Raw figures from the study. Voluntary and involuntary departures are not recorded separately. · Source: Ahearne; Pourmasoudi; Atefi; Lam (2025)
Keep target planning and pay separate until the numbers are stable. If you tie commissions to rates that are still estimated, you pay for chance. The basics are covered in the article on sales compensation. Whether the weekly numbers are being reached is seen most reliably in a well-kept list of all open opportunities, as described in the article on pipeline management for small and mid-sized companies.
What you can put into practice right away
- Collect numbers: Note revenue, number of orders, and number of quotes for the last twelve months. Order value and close rate follow from these.
- Calculate the staircase: Fill in the seven rows of the template. Estimate where data is missing and mark the estimate.
- Check feasibility: Put the weekly numbers next to your calendar. Do five first conversations fit into a normal week?
- Set the appointment: Enter a weekly 15-minute appointment where planned and actual numbers sit side by side.
- Measure again: After four weeks, recalculate the staircase with the measured rates.
After one quarter you have something most annual targets lack: a calculation you have checked against real numbers, and a weekly routine that shows whether you are on course.
The answer to the question we started with is therefore: an annual target guides daily work when you translate it into weekly activities via order value and close rate, and compare these numbers with actual results every week. The target staircase remains a calculation built on assumptions. It becomes reliable only once you recalculate it with measured rates.
Frequently asked questions
How do I plan sales targets properly?
Start with a justified annual revenue goal and subtract the expected existing business. Convert the gap into orders, quotes, and conversations using order value and conversion rates. Spread these values across your working weeks and check them every week.
What is the difference between a revenue target and an activity target?
A revenue target describes the outcome that should stand at the end. An activity target describes what you do for it every week, such as a certain number of first conversations. The outcome also depends on the customer, while the activity is in your hands.
How many quotes do I need to hit my revenue target?
Divide the planned revenue from new business by your average order value, which gives the number of orders. Divide that by your close rate. With 30 orders and a 30 percent close rate, that is 100 quotes.
How high should a sales target be?
High enough to be demanding and still be considered feasible. A laboratory experiment by Chowdhury (1993) shows that effort increases with a rising quota only up to a point and may decrease afterwards. So check whether the weekly numbers fit into a normal working week.
How often should I review sales targets?
Compare the weekly numbers every week in a short fixed appointment. Measure your rates again once a quarter and recalculate the Target Staircase. That way you notice deviations early enough to correct course.
Sources
- Chowdhury, J. (1993): The Motivational Impact of Sales Quotas on Effort. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(1), 28-41.
- Claro, D. P.; Plouffe, C. R.; Vieira, V. A. (2023): Sales compensation plan type and sales opportunity coverage: “Double-edged” sword effects on sales performance. Industrial Marketing Management.
- Morelli, G.; Braganza, A. (2012): Goal setting barriers: a pharmaceutical sales force case study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(2), 312-332.
- Ahearne, M.; Pourmasoudi, M.; Atefi, Y.; Lam, S. K. (2025): Sales Performance Rankings: Examining the Impact of the Type of Information Displayed on Sales Force Outcomes. Journal of Marketing, 89(1), 94-116.
- Jain, S. (2012): Self-Control and Incentives: An Analysis of Multiperiod Quota Plans. Marketing Science.



